here (link ) items of "mmnews" in the madness of the sprits of ethanol is reported.
------------------------------------------------ ------------
E-10: incredible perversion and apocalyptic decadence. Millions of tonnes of food to be brewed "organic" ethanol. Who wants to be a good eco, the wasting away so his fellow man - supposedly to save the climate. - Now that the child has long since fallen into the well and the lies are obvious, they whine around and no one will have been's.
What has really changed concretely at the service station, there are "Super 95", ie the previous super gasoline, 95 octane, or do we continue to swallow the toad actually E10? Questions at various gas stations and the respective companies reveals the following picture:
Aral: Is it
- not anymore:
-
Past Super 95th Instead, still stands at one tap per station continues to be "Super" turn, flows out, however, super plus and even at the price of super plus. - official reason
both at refineries and tank farms to there is no capacity for extra protection product varieties. In addition, the majority of the refineries can not mix Biobeimischungen allow parallel in the same product, it may not parallel, a Super 95 E5 Super 95 and E10 are produced in a refinery. Since the system not a product disappears, it must be avoided to an existing product. Aral uses accordingly be super plus 98, which has a maximum ethanol content of 5%. - mood at a local gas station:
uncertainty and also voiced displeasure with the air-nonsense on the part of customers. "Rip-off" was called. The farmer: "At various stations are already shortages of super plus, because only 5% of refinery distillates to super plus 98 can be processed and there is increased demand."
Shell:
- Past Super 95:
is no longer available from now. Alternative V-Power is the current eight cents premium over Super E10. - official reason
Both the production capacity of the refineries and the number of fuel tanks at refineries and tank farms, and in particular at gas stations usually limited. - mood at a local gas station:
-
Esso:
- Past Super 95:
Super 95 is still present, in addition to Super E10 offered provided the dispensers allow the service stations so. The price of Super 95 is the same as super plus. - official reason
availability of tanks at refineries, fuel depots and petrol stations. Three varieties of super gasoline can not accomplish many depots. - mood at a local gas station:
Super 95 regional partly close, because not many dare to fuel E10. There are doubts about the compatibility with many vehicles, the lack of long-term experience is called for. The farmer: "There again lies behind the EU - do not know who because his back Interests has prevailed, but we were not "Total
.
- Past Super 95:
is still offered as a separate fuel and has a price between E10 and super plus. - official reason
Will remain on the current state remains so indefinitely. - customer sentiment at a local gas station:
The landlady: "From the Green Party is running out."
Jet:
- Past Super 95:
Still available, but was more expensive and currently the same price as super plus. It is anticipated the thought that Super 95 again in the future will have a lower price than Super Plus. - official reason
Super 95 is the long term continue to be made available, because many vehicles do not tolerate E10. The current price parity of super 95 and super plus is due to higher procurement costs for Super 95 and the prescribed penalty charges by the quota system of the "bio" fuel. - customer sentiment at a local gas station:
The landlady: "The Most still do not know whether their car E10 compatible. Many buy E10 because it's cheaper "
OMV.
- Past Super 95:
Still available, but was more expensive and now costs the same as super plus. - official reason
How long it stays that way is uncertain, but a date for setting the Super 95 is not known. For now it is available. - customer sentiment at a local gas station:
The farmer: "The problem is not on our petrol stations, but by our Federal Government, who started the whole mess. We can spoon up the soup, they have brewed us. Most customers fill up super plus. Meanwhile, the media have to say it, E10 is more environmentally harmful than the existing fuel. The government has just searched for a reason for the nonsense. "
disappear Will Super 95? The fuel itself could actually disappear soon, as has the greatest of the gas station chains, Aral, already shown clearly what is going on. The name or "protection sites" remains Super, which is regulated by law. However, behind it a superior product like super plus hide - for higher price of course. The stupid it is and will be who? Exactly, you.
This raises the question of why so far no one has great excitement about this ethanol nonsense because we drive it all the time with up to five per cent bio-ethanol in gasoline. Actually should have been standing on the taps "E5". In addition to the significant uncertainty in the drivers if their vehicle E10 compatible - for political reasons should actually boycott all the stuff - also raises the question whether the blending of ethanol leads to poor performance or consumption.
Auto Bild has tested it and came to a conclusion on 17/02/2011 unique, consumption will increase by around 5%:
Assuming an average consumption of 0.6 liters per 100 kilometers, with an annual mileage of 20,000 kilometers of expensive, at a golf fuel costs by 176 euros per year. So on Super 95 fuel? This is thanks to grandfathering, but with the introduction of E10 is increasing, unfortunately, the price of the previously normal super five to ten cents per liter, it costs so many places now as much as Super Plus with 98 octane.
[...]
The driver is thus in each case the loser. Either he does the more expensive Super 95, or it fills up with E10, and must live with the increased fuel consumption. Either way, he is charged on it. As always.
E10 good for the climate?
What a strange statement, the bottom line is that even more "evil CO2 in the environment than before. This leaked lie aroused now probably the Umweltfuzzies and avoid harm to turn away, they come now - after no less, when everything is much too late - apparently critical to the plan, such as the Bund, the Federation for Environmental and Nature Protection Germany. He said on 02/24/2011 in the world :
Theavailable at more and more gas stations Biospritsorte E10 brings the opinion of the Federal Environment and Nature Conservation Germany (BUND) has no effect on the climate. "As for the environmental balance, E10 is a sham and a case of consumer deception," said the national chairman Hubert Weiger.
a dishonest baggage with green exterior paint is this no one can "save" the climate, since it must be saved at all and certainly not by the people who can not even predict the weather correctly.
But not only the multiple engines of intolerance E10 is the problem, but the incredible perversion and decadence of the eschatological, with which we are dealing with here. Millions of tonnes of food are now being brewed to "organic" ethanol. Who wants to be a good organic, which can starve so, just in his fellow man, rather than the climate look after themselves - although that's with the climate one of the biggest lies of all time.
are particularly ridiculous in this context, the statements of Green politicians who endorse these organized fraud with the air-lie for years and are now acting with apparent moral objections to E10. The West reported on 2/24/2011 on a Such eco-copy:
for the Green Party Bundestag Friedrich Ostendorff is ultimately about the ethical core question: "plate or tank?"
[...]
"The fact that the ecological balance by introduction of E10 fails better, must be questioned alone in the face of production routes for ethanol, "said organic farmer from Mount Kamen, and reckons:" In order alone to satisfy the German demand for E10 would have to of the 12 million hectares of arable land in Germany, only 1 million hectares for the cultivation of commodities such as corn and sugar beet for the production of Ethanol are maintained. "
really interesting, what flexibility and what a long line who love people's representatives have sometimes. As the green eco-farmer sits in parliament, probably from his work on the organic farm, tired and weary, and missed all the debates on this smooth Ökomist. But no, it is indeed to blame Brussels alone. Because there is no sitting around the countryside? And why then make your big mouth not on time?
A disgusting hypocrisy is, and always at the expense of citizens. We are used to that lied to, exploited and patronized to be. Let's see how long this habit still be maintained, because it ferments and rumbling in increasing numbers of jobs and even here in our country, not only in North Africa.
We note at this miserable Nahrungsmitteldekadenz that the war and postwar generation is now almost disappeared or died, as none of them would understand had, food to abuse as a fuel or heating fuel, especially not where there is no need it is based and this "ecological" argument solely on lies. This generation has no residues are left on their plate and they would never have valuable crops simply burned or procedural. As would be the more militant Ökonachbar been disposed of secretly at night in the organic waste environmentally safe.
E10 will consist How long we shall see. Almost 10% of arable land required percentage can change quickly, as soon as the global supply situation continues to escalate. Namely, the ongoing insurgency have a lot to do with rising food prices. So take advantage of every opportunity, such as refueling, to do their displeasure with this false frenzy known, and the friendly people make the on climate lie attention.
------------------------------------------------ ------------and here's a nice article of "peculiarly free" ( link) to do so.
------------------------------------------------ -------------
Like all planned economic measures, the new E10 fuel harms the environment and reduces the welfare of society. Despite consumer boycott of the new scrap-fuel E10 is now to use force against the will of providers and consumers are introduced, accompanied by so-called "information campaigns" that are either subsidized or government-enforced by the state. This is about propaganda, because nothing you say about the new E10 fuel is true.
E10 is not cheaper than regular gasoline without the 10-percent ethanol blend of rotten biomaterials, mostly food. A motor vehicle that is fueled with E10 consumed, namely, the 5 per cent more fuel than a vehicle that runs without admixture of bioethanol. With currently € 1.60 per liter will cost high-quality Super Plus gasoline, but only 4.6 percent more than the Gammel-E10 gasoline, which contains rotten biomaterials. Currently € 1.53 for E10 is required, what more expensive because of the additional consumption on E10 is a super plus.
at 5 percent consumption by E10 evaporate up to half the 10 percent addition of biomaterials without effect compared to regular gasoline. This is not a miracle, but bio-ethanol, according to official figures, only two thirds of the energy content of conventional gasoline, while at the same time poor in the engine burns. At the same time increase with the maintenance costs for a car that is fueled with E10. Where in comparison to conventional gasoline for the same 5 percent more fuel mileage from tank, fuel hoses and engine flow, are a greater wear and higher maintenance costs to secure logical consequence. Additional possible immediate or long-term effects are incalculable risk. rise
that prices for regular gasoline with E10-forced introduction now is logical and not malevolence the gas station operators and oil companies, and politicians and even lie automobile associations. Since E10 as a slow-moving storage and supply capacities binds without bringing revenue, must necessarily raise the cost of conventional fuel types. The additional costs incurred by E10, which sells not have to be allocated to the fuel types that sell. Otherwise, the gas stations went bankrupt and could offer no more gasoline. to subject
the stations by the government greed is an incredible audacity. The tax portion of the petrol price is whopping 63 percent of gasoline sales, while the gross margin for gasoline sold only 3 percent of sales. The state earns so based on the sales of gasoline with no direct return, the 21-fold compared to the petrol sellers themselves, which offer a performance petrol and all associated logistics. And only the taxes are included, which are levied directly on the liter of gasoline. Other taxes such as property taxes, business taxes or payroll taxes, which are also costs for the station operator and thus drive the price of gasoline is up, not with einberechnet. By comparison with 5 to 7-year government bonds in the euro area can be on average 3.66 percent return per year per sold to the state or make conferred unit of money without selling a product like gasoline, only 3 percent brings return on sales, or even to work for something, anything. It is a wonder that at all gasoline is sold.
E10 pollutes the environment and has a negative CO2 balance, as the federal government warns conservation. This was because the cultivation of agricultural raw materials for the production of bioethanol replaced natural areas, reduce the CO2. Also in the cultivation and even fertilizer production technologies that produce CO2 and general strain on resources and natural course, although it is not economically viable. Finally, so-called biofuel costs more than comparable alternatives and more than people are willing to pay for it. Biofuel is made as in the madness with billions in subsidies from taxpayers' money has been driven by force "profitable". The taxes increase the cost in turn reduce the life of the people and prosperity levels.
displaced addition, the cultivation of agricultural raw materials for the inefficient and polluting heating fuel in motor vehicles, the cultivation of food and thus more expensive food prices, which many people starve, and many a child in the world. No matter what the EU leaders come up here as an excuse. The subsidies the company always scarce resources that otherwise would have found other uses are withdrawn. That this will increase the cost also, and especially food, is obvious and inevitable. Who buys E10 voluntarily makes a question not only for the polluters, but also responsible for welfare and hunger deaths in the world. By the way have E10 buyers higher fuel costs and ruining their cars.
The incentive to save is in the natural behavior of the man himself founded. No one wants to consume more fuel and resources as necessary. Everyone is looking in nature for the best price and the cheapest method of production, which - on the sole condition that the property rights of all are protected - for protection of environment and resources the most. Just by the forced state intervention in the gasoline market, this mechanism is prevented by force. To produce a liter of ethanol, would require 4,000 liters of water, says Nestlé CEO Peter Brabeck-Lethmate and sees rising food prices, the perverse result of high biofuel subsidies as the FAZ wrote.
What do reach the EU leaders and their German agents in federal and state legislatures, with their "organic" coercive measures, remains a mystery. It is clear that the consequences of environmental degradation, waste of resources, wealth destruction, starvation deaths and the end even brazen propaganda. After all the nonsense we supposed to be sold tax-paid and imposed "information campaigns" as a blessing. The limits of this stupidity could be admired in the landscape of ruins of the former GDR and the Soviet Union and in the EU, to be admired, if the policy goes on.
------------------------------------------------- ------------
avarchillion
0 comments:
Post a Comment